Technical Standard for "Electronic, Computer, or Other Technological Aids" Used in Playing Class II Games

This document was published in the Federal Register. For the official electronic format, use the PDF linked in the document's sidebar.

Public Document 06-6787 (71 FR 46336)

• Document Details

Public Content - Document Details

Agency National Indian Gaming Commission CFR 25 CFR 547 Document Citation 71 FR 46336 Document Number 06-6787 Document Type Proposed Rule Pages 46336-46361 (26 pages) Publication Date 08/11/2006 RIN 3141-AA29

Public Content - Document Details Official Content Official Content Public Content - Document Details

Agency National Indian Gaming Commission CFR 25 CFR 547 Document Citation 71 FR 46336 Document Number 06-6787 Document Type Proposed Rule Pages 46336-46361 (26 pages) Publication Date 08/11/2006 RIN 3141-AA29

Public Content - Document Details Publication details - Document date Comment deadline September 30, 2006 Body of text Please submit comments by September 30, 2006. Publication details - Document date Enhanced Content - Table of Contents

• Agency
• Action
• Summary
• Dates
• Contacts
• Contacts
• Supplementary Information
• Background
• Development of Proposed Rulemaking Through Consultation with Indian Tribes
• Purpose and Scope
• Regulatory Matters
• Regulatory Flexibility Act
• Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
• Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
• Taking
• Civil Justice Reform
• Paperwork Reduction Act
• National Environmental Policy Act
• 25CFR Part 547 Topic List
• Part 547 - Minimum Technical Standards for Gaming Equipment Used to Play Class II Games

Enhanced Content - Table of Contents Extended Content - Public Comments Comments are closed. See DATES for details. Extended Content - Public Comments Extended Content - Regulations. gov Data There is currently no additional information about this document. Extended Content - Regulations. gov Data Extended Content - Share Shortened Document URL https://www. federalregister. gov/d/06-6787 Email Send this document to a friend Extended Content - Share Extended Content - Print Extended Content - Print Enhanced Content - Document Statistics

Page views for a document are updated periodically throughout the day and are a cumulative count for this document. The count is subject to sampling, reprocessing, and correction (increase or decrease) throughout the day. Page Views 113 as of 10/11/2024 2:15 am EDT

Enhanced Content - Document Statistics Extended conten t-Other formats

This document can be used in the following format: JSON Normalized attributes and metadata XML original ful l-text XML MODS government publications Metadata detailed information and documents are on the developer tool page.

Extended conten t-Other formats Public Document 06-6787 (71 FR 46336)

This document was published in the Federal Register. For the official electronic format, use the PDF linked in the document's sidebar.

Document heading

The headline of the document depends on the type of document, but the following contents may be included:

1. The name of the institution that issued and signed a document
2. The number of the CFR title and the number of each part related to the revision, propose revisions, or are amended.
3. Litigation number of ministries and agencies / internal file numbers of ministries
4. Rin identifies each regulation measure described in Unified Agenda of Federal Regular.

National Indian Gaming Committee

1. 25 CFR part 547
2. Rin 3141-AA29

Agency

National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC or Committee).

Action

Summary

This rule is the technical standards for class II games (other games, pull tabs, or "instant bings"), which are mainly performed through "electrons, computers, or other technical aid means". Is to add a new part to the rules of the committee. In this rule, the process is established to guarantee the integrity before such games and subsidies are installed in class II tribal gaming management. Currently, there is no such standard. The committee proposes this measure to support the tribal gaming regulatory authorities and operators to ensure the perfection and safety of class II games and gaming revenue.

Dates

Submit your opinion by September 30, 2006.

Contacts

Date: "Opinion on Technical Standards" NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMISSION, 1441 L Street, NW. You can send it , The original must be mailed or submitted to the above address. Technologically techstds@nigc. gov instead of mail or fax. Please specify "Class II Technical Regulations" in the subject.

Contacts

Michael Gross, senior lawyer, legal advisor office, telephone: 202. 632. 7003. Not a tol l-free dial.

Supplementary Information

Background

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 (25 U. S. C. 2701-21, "IGRA") established the National Indian Gaming Commission ("NIGC" or "Commission") and provides a comprehensive framework for regulating gaming on Indian lands. The Act creates three classes of Indian gaming.

• "Class I gaming" means social games played only for prizes of minimal value in connection with tribal ceremonies and celebrations, or traditional Indian gaming. Indian tribes regulate only type I gaming.
• "Type II gaming" means games of chance commonly known as bingo, and includes pull-tab, lotto, punchboard, tip-jar, instant bingo, and other games similar to bingo, and various non-house-banked card games, when played in the same location, whether or not electronic, computer, or other technological aids are used. Specifically excluded from Class II gaming are banking card games such as blackjack, electronic or electromechanical replicas of any game of chance, and slot machines of any kind. 25 U. S. C. 2703(7)(B). Indian tribes and the NIGC share regulatory authority over Class II gaming. Indian tribes may engage in Class II gaming without State involvement.
• "Type III gambling" includes all forms of gambling other than Type I or Type II gambling (25 U. S. C. 2703(8)). Thus, Class III gaming includes lotteries and all other games of chance, including most forms of casino gaming, such as slot machines, roulette, and banking card games such as blackjack. Type III gaming may be lawfully conducted only if a tribe and the state in which the tribe is located have entered into a tribal-state compact regarding such gaming. Alternatively, tribes may operate Class III gaming under gaming procedures issued by the Secretary of the Interior. States, Indian tribes, and the NIGC have regulatory authority over Class III gaming. In addition, the U. S. Department of Justice and U. S. Attorneys have exclusive criminal jurisdiction, and certain civil jurisdiction, over Class III gaming on Indian lands.

The Commission has determined that it is in the best interest of Indian gaming to adopt technical standards governing the implementation of electronic, computer, and other technological aids used to play Class II games. The technical standards are intended to provide a means for tribal gaming regulators and tribal operators to ensure that the integrity of Class II games played using electronic, computer, or other technological aids is maintained, that the games and aids are secure, and that the games and aids are fully auditable, thus providing gaming authorities and gaming operators a means to account for all gaming revenues.

Development of Proposed Rulemaking Through Consultation with Indian Tribes

Recognizing tribal sovereignty and the fundamental importance of standards in the operation and regulation of gaming on Indian lands under IGRA, the Commission has developed a policy and process for consultation with Indian tribes to provide an opportunity for early and meaningful input from tribes regarding the development of these proposed rules.

In particular, while the Commission initially communicated to tribes the Commission's intent to develop standards, it actively consulted with tribes regarding the development of the Commission's first official intergovernmental tribal consultation policy. After months of consultation with tribes, the Commission's official intertribal consultation policy was adopted and published in the Federal Register on March 31, 2004 (69 FR 16973). The Commission purposefully established this policy to provide consultation policy guidelines for meaningful prior tribal consultation on these standards and other rulemaking initiatives the Commission plans.

The Commission's official "Tribal Consultation Policy" specifies that when developing proposed new or revised administrative rules that may substantially affect the operation or regulation of gaming on Indian lands, the Commission will, to the extent permitted by law, engage in regular, timely, and meaningful intergovernmental consultation with Indian tribes. To implement this policy, the Commission has devised a three-part plan to provide tribes with reasonable and practical opportunities to consult with the Commission and provide early input on the rulemaking before proposed new rules are published in the Federal Register and the actual rulemaking process begins.

First, the Commission sought to consult directly with each gaming tribe at least twice between May 2003 and March 2006 regarding the development of these and other proposed regulations. During this period, the Commission sent individual invitations to more than 500 tribes to consult with and provide input to the Commission. Many tribes accepted and participated in individual intergovernmental consultations with the Commission on proposed rules and other matters. Although some tribes declined the Commission's invitations, between May 2003 and March 2006, the Commission conducted more than 300 government-to-government consultations with tribes and their leaders and representatives.

Second, on March 31, 2004, the Commission established a Joint Federal-Tribal Advisory Committee, consisting of Commission and tribal representatives, to assist the Commission in developing regulations. In January 2004, the Commission asked gaming tribes across the United States to nominate tribal representatives to serve on the Advisory Committee. On March 31, 2004, the Commission selected seven tribal representatives from among the tribes that nominated them: Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians, Gaming Commissioner, Norm DeRosier; Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Gaming Commission Executive Director, Joseph Carlini; and Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chipewii Indians, Gaming Commission Executive Director, Kenneth Ermatinger. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Michigan, Gaming Commission Executive Director Kenneth Ermatinger; Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma, Gaming Commission Director Jamie Hummingbird; St. Regis Mohawk Tribe, Gaming Commission Inspection Manager Mark Garrow; Muckleshoot Indian Bingo, General Manager Melvin Daniels; and Seminole Tribe of Florida, Senior Vice President of Gaming Operations Charles Lombard. To date, the Advisory Committee has met six times: May 13, 2004 (Washington, DC), August 2-3, 2004 (Washington, DC), September 13-14, 2004 (Cherokee, NC), December 1-3, 2004 (Oklahoma City, OK), January 12-13, 2005 (Palm Springs, CA), and March 11, 2005 (Chicago, IL). All of these Committee meetings were open to the public, and the Committee discussed various features of Class II and Class III games of chance, their play, and related gaming technology and methods. In addition, the Committee discussed, reviewed, critiqued, and commented on two different successive preliminary working drafts of proposed Class II technical standards prepared by Committee members. Seven Tribal Committee representatives provided early tribal input and valuable insight, advice, and assistance to the Committee in developing their respective working drafts and the current proposed rule.

The establishment of the Committee's Federal Federation and Tribal Advisory Committee was a legal struggle while the committee was preparing for the announcement of the rules. About one year after the establishment of the committee, the FLATHEAD NATION Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes and Santa Rancheria Indian Community are not qualified to participate in the committee. And the committee member I sued for the meeting. As a result of the Federal Court, the temporary deduction order was rejected, but the committee has decided that the committee's legal status should be further disposed and that it should be published and requested comments. The committee also clarified the tribes nominated the committee to clarify the role of the committee members as the official representative of the tribe. As a result of this clarity, and as a result, the committee requested two committee members to retire.

The third committee's efforts for consultation with the tribes before the creation of regulation drafts, apart from the federal and tribal joint advisory committees, various proprietary work drafts, all tribes. The leader has been able to view and comment. In particular, while these rules were formulated, the first and second work drafts were mailed to the tribes and their leaders to seek written opinions. The draft was also posted on the committee's website, and all people were able to browse and express their opinions. Many tribes and general citizens have submitted written comments on their work drafts. The comments of these tribes were shared with members of the Advisory Committee and were carefully examined by the committee. The

The Gaming Standards Association and the largest Indian Gaming Association (National Indian Gaming Association) December 2004 The meeting was held in Las Vegas, Nevada, so that both organizations have examined technical standards so that they could propose to the committee. The committee was invited, listened to discussions, and dispatched staff to answer questions if necessary.

In addition, from January 2003 to March 2005, the tribal gaming association in the state and the region, the US Indian Gaming Association, and the US Indian Conference on the United States Indian Conference, tribal gaming operators and regulators. We attended meetings and meetings to gather and gave lectures. At these meetings and conferences, the committee has provided the latest information on the progress and status of regulatory formulation to the tribal leaders the intent and plan of regulatory formulation. The committee has also been able to answer any of the rules of tribal leaders and any questions about its formulation at these conferences.

Through these various means, the committee will actively provide a rational and practical opportunity to meet all tribes with the Committee for all tribes for the past 26 months. We strive to provide meaningful tribal opinions early on the formulation and implementation of these rules.

Purpose and range

Purpose and Scope

In addition, from January 2003 to March 2005, the tribal gaming association in the state and the region, the US Indian Gaming Association, and the US Indian Conference on the United States Indian Conference, tribal gaming operators and regulators. We attended meetings and meetings to gather and gave lectures. At these meetings and conferences, the committee has provided the latest information on the progress and status of regulatory formulation and status of regulations to the tribal leaders. The committee has also been able to answer any of the rules of tribal leaders and any questions about its formulation at these conferences.

Through these various means, the committee will actively provide a rational and practical opportunity to meet all tribes with the Committee for all tribes for the past 26 months. We strive to provide meaningful tribal opinions early on the formulation and implementation of these rules.

Purpose and range

The proposed part547 is mainly applied to electronic, computer, or other technical auxiliary means, or class II games performed through changes in such games and supplements. Not applied to live session bingo. Class II games performed through such technical assistance are widely used in Indian gaming management, but there is no unified standard for the implementation. The rules of these rules aim to correct such missing and establish technical standards for such games and assistive equipment. The Gaming Standards Association and the largest Indian Gaming Association (National Indian Gaming Association) December 2004 The meeting was held in Las Vegas, Nevada, so that both organizations have examined technical standards so that they could propose to the committee. The committee was invited, listened to discussions, and dispatched staff to answer questions if necessary.

In addition, from January 2003 to March 2005, the tribal gaming association in the state and the region, the US Indian Gaming Association, and the US Indian Conference on the United States Indian Conference, tribal gaming operators and regulators. We attended meetings and meetings to gather and gave lectures. At these meetings and conferences, the committee has provided the latest information on the progress and status of regulatory formulation and status of regulations to the tribal leaders. The committee has also been able to answer any of the rules of tribal leaders and any questions about its formulation at these conferences.

Through these various means, the committee will actively provide a rational and practical opportunity to meet all tribes with the Committee for all tribes for the past 26 months. We strive to provide meaningful tribal opinions early on the formulation and implementation of these rules.

Purpose and range

The proposed part547 is mainly applied to electronic, computer, or other technical auxiliary means, or class II games performed through changes in such games and supplements. Not applied to live session bingo. Class II games performed through such technical assistance are widely used in Indian gaming management, but there is no unified standard for the implementation. The rules of these rules aim to correct such missing and establish technical standards for such games and assistive equipment.

Again, this technical standard is a class II game that is performed by tribal gaming regulatory authorities and tribal operators using electronic devices, computers, or other technical supplements. The purpose is to ensure safety and provide a means to guarantee that a complete audit of games and auxiliary means is possible. At that time, the technical standards are modeled on similar standards not only in North America but also in experienced gaming jurisdictions, not only in North America. For example, the requirements of a game accounting meter model are modeled on Nevada's requirements.

Regulatory Matters

Regulatory Flexibility Act

However, the secon d-class gambling has a unique aspect, which has little models at present, and did not exist at the time the committee started this project. Bingo is a game in which multiple players participate, as IGRA defines, and players compete with each other to first cover the numbers or other specifications (printing page 46338) in advance. In order to meet the legal requirements of IGRA, the implementation of electronic bingo must be able to play common games in different places, whether in one facility or multiple facilities. For this reason, manufacturers implement bingo with client server architectures. The general method is to install a client machine as an electronic player station on the casino floor. These display the bingo card, make the players can cover the lottery numbers, and pay the acquired prize. The server is usually outside the floor, lottery of random numbers, and passed to client machines for gameplay through data communication lines. Such a client server method is not common in other gaming areas, and has regulated issues in which most of the other gaming areas are not sufficiently tackled.

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act

The proposed rule therefore introduces minimum standards regarding the mechanisms that may be used to verify the authenticity of the game software present on the server or on the client, or both, and when that verification must occur, as well as when and by whom the game may be downloaded or modified. The proposed rule also establishes general minimum technical standards for servers, clients, and standards common to both clients and servers. It also establishes minimum standards for software storage media, handling of money and credits, and data communications, all of which may require different treatment when using clients and servers as opposed to standalone games.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

To ensure compliance with technical standards, the proposed rules again borrow from established practices of tribal, state, and local gaming jurisdictions throughout North America. The proposed rules establish a process of game submission by the manufacturer, review and analysis by a qualified independent testing laboratory, and approval by the tribal gaming regulator as a necessary prerequisite for games and aids to be offered to the public for play in Class II gaming operations.

Under the proposed rule, tribal gaming authorities would require manufacturers to submit all Class II games and ancillary devices, or modifications to such games and ancillary devices, to a testing laboratory for review and analysis. This submission would include a working prototype of the game and ancillary device, all associated software, and full documentation and description of all features and components. The testing laboratory would then certify whether the game or ancillary device meets the requirements of the proposed rule, and any additional requirements the tribal gaming authority may adopt. The testing laboratory would then submit a certificate and report of its analysis and conclusions to the tribal gaming authority for approval or disapproval of the game or ancillary device. The tribal gaming authority would retain the certificate and report for as long as the game is publicly playable on the casino floor. This would allow the Commission to fulfill its regulatory oversight role.

Taking

Regulatory Matters

Civil Justice Reform

The proposed rule is intended to comply with the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U. S. C. 601 et seq.). Indian tribes are not considered small entities for purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Paperwork Reduction Act

These rules are not the main rules based on 5 U. S. C. 804 (2), 5 U. S. C. 804 (2), which is the SMALL Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. These rules do not have more than $ 100 million economic effects a year. This regulations do not significantly increase costs and prices to consumers, individual industries, federal governments, state governments, local governments, or geographical regions, and are competitive, employment, investment, It does not have a significant adverse effect on productivity, technological innovation, or the ability to compete with foreig n-based companies. The European Commission believes that it is limited to independent inspection and test requirements for an additional expense to the Indian casinos, which operate class II games and assistive equipment. The committee has obtained information that the management has already done this as a matter of course. Similarly, the committee does not expect a large additional cost to redesign and r e-purchase class II games and assistive equipment. Many manufacturers that sell class II games and equipment have already manufactured devices sold in casino markets other than Class III and Indians. Furthermore, feedback from manufacturers so far has shown the support of these standards.

Reform of funding for funding

For these reasons, the European Commission has determined that this rule does not impose an obligation to provide more than $ 100 million a year to state, regional, tribal governments, or private sector. did. For this reason, these rules are not "important regulation measures" based on the UNFUNDED MANDATES REFORM ACT (Unfbeded Mandates Reform Act). The committee is the case that this rule is applied to the tribal government, because the tribal government owns, operates, regulations, and licensing gaming facilities in Indian land defined by the Indian Gaming Regulation Law. It was determined that rules could have a unique impact on tribal governments. For this reason, in accordance with Article 203 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, the committee provides sufficient notifications to the tribal government, opportunities for meaningful consultation, information on compliance, advice, and education. The plan was implemented.

Again, the committee's plan includes the establishment of a tribal advisory committee and the opinions of the tribal leaders through the establishment of the tribal advisory committee and the provisions of the rules provided to tribes and the provisions of the rules provided to tribes (). Page for printing 46339). Article 204 (b) of the undecared obligation law (b) meets an officer selected from the tribe (or its nominated master) for the purpose of exchanging opinions, information, and advice on the responsibility of the government or the implementation of the government. It is excluded with the Federal Advisory Committee Law (5 U. S. C. App.). In the election of the committee members, the applicant's experience in this field, the size of the tribes represented by the candidate, the geographical position of the gaming operations, and the size and type of gaming to be implemented. The committee adopted diversity and tried to gather committees representing the interests of tribal gaming. The committee will have a meeting with the Advisory Committee, discuss public comments received by the publication of the rules, and make recommendations on the final rules. In addition, the committee will continue to provide technical support to tribes through local offices in order to support the issues raised in this rule.

Taking

In accordance with the administrative order 12630, the European Commission has determined that this rule does not have a serious taking. There is no need for the impact of the infringement of rights.

Civil judicial reform

In accordance with the Presidential Ordinance 12988, the Legal Advancement Office does not impose an unreasonable burden on the judicial system, but satisfies the requirements of paragraphs 3 (a) and paragraph 3 (B) (2) of the Ordinance. I judged that there was.

Paper work reduction method

This rule is required to collect information based on the 1995 Paperwork Reduction Law (44 U. S. C. 3501, et Seq., Et Seq. (Office of Management and Budget). And the respondent category is also explained in the < Span> of the Committee, along with the estimation of the annual information collection burden, and the provision of a tribal consultation committee. Through opinions on the rules, it includes the opinions of the tribal leader (the Page 46339 (B) for Printing Reform Law). For the purpose of exchanging opinions, information, and advice, the meeting with the officers (or their nominations) selected from the tribe is excluded by the Committee of the Federal Advisory Committee (5 U. S. C. App.). In the election, the applicant's experience in this field, the size of the tribes represented by the candidate, the geographical position of the gaming operation, and the size and type of gaming to be implemented. , A committee of the tribal gaming interests, has a meeting with the Advisory Committee, discussing the public comments received by the announcement of this rule, and will make recommendations on the final rules. In addition, the committee will continue to provide technical support through local offices in order to support the issues raised in this rule.

Taking

In accordance with the administrative order 12630, the European Commission has determined that this rule does not have a serious taking. There is no need for the impact of the infringement of rights.	Civil judicial reform	In accordance with the Presidential Ordinance 12988, the Legal Advancement Office does not impose an unreasonable burden on the judicial system, but satisfies the requirements of paragraphs 3 (a) and paragraph 3 (B) (2) of the Ordinance. I judged that there was.	Paper work reduction method	This rule is required to collect information based on the 1995 Paperwork Reduction Law (44 U. S. C. 3501, et Seq., Et Seq. (Office of Management and Budget). And the respondent category is also explained here, along with the estimation of the annual information collection burden, and the provisions of the Committee's Advisory Committee and the provisions provided by the government. Through the opinion of the tribal leader, it is included (B) of the unsupported pages for the Reforms of Printing (B). For the purpose of exchanging information and advice, a meeting with officers (or its nominated masters) from the tribe is excluded in the election of members of the Federal Advisory Committee (5 U. S. C. App.). The applicant's experience in this field, the size of the tribes represented by the candidates, the geography of gaming operations, and the size and type of gaming to be implemented were taken into account. The committee of the representative of the interests, the committee will meet with the Advisory Committee, will discuss the public comments on the publication of the rules. In addition, the committee will continue to provide technical support to tribes through local offices in order to support the issues raised in this rule.	Taking	In accordance with the administrative order 12630, the European Commission has determined that this rule does not have a serious taking. There is no need for the impact of the infringement of rights.	This rule is required to collect information based on the 1995 Paperwork Reduction Law (44 U. S. C. 3501, et Seq., Et Seq. (Office of Management and Budget). And the respondent category is also explained here, along with the estimation of the annual information collection burden, and the provisions of the Committee's Advisory Committee and the provisions provided by the government. Through the opinion of the tribal leader, it is included (B) of the unsupported pages for the Reforms of Printing (B). For the purpose of exchanging information and advice, a meeting with officers (or its nominated masters) from the tribe is excluded in the election of members of the Federal Advisory Committee (5 U. S. C. App.). The applicant's experience in this field, the size of the tribes represented by the candidates, the geography of gaming operations, and the size and type of gaming to be implemented were taken into account. The committee of the representative of the interests, the committee will meet with the Advisory Committee, will discuss the public comments on the publication of the rules. In addition, the committee will continue to provide technical support to tribes through local offices in order to support the issues raised in this rule.	In accordance with the Presidential Ordinance 12988, the Legal Advancement Office does not impose an unreasonable burden on the judicial system, but satisfies the requirements of paragraphs 3 (a) and paragraph 3 (B) (2) of the Ordinance. I judged that there was.
Paper work reduction method	This rule is required to collect information based on the 1995 Paperwork Reduction Law (44 U. S. C. 3501, et Seq., Et Seq. (Office of Management and Budget). And the respondent category is explained below, along with an estimate of the annual information collection burden.	5	150	With respect to the following information collections, the Commission solicits comment on: (1) whether the proposed information collection is necessary to properly perform its functions, including whether the information has practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection, including the reasonableness of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the information collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the information collection on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques and other information technology, where appropriate.	1875	75	With respect to the following information collections, the Commission solicits comment on: (1) whether the proposed information collection is necessary to properly perform its functions, including whether the information has practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection, including the reasonableness of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the information collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the information collection on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques and other information technology, where appropriate.	Summary of Information and Statement of Need The proposed rule would establish a process for ensuring that electronic, computer, or other technological aids used in playing Class II games have been reviewed and evaluated by a qualified independent testing organization prior to approval by tribal gaming regulators and installation on the floor at Class II tribal gaming operations. This process helps ensure the proper functioning of the equipment and the integrity, fairness, and auditability of the games played.
Under this process, tribal gaming authorities will require manufacturers to submit all Class II games that are played primarily through electronic, computer, or other technological aids, or modifications to such games or aids, to a qualified independent testing laboratory for review and analysis. The submission will include a working prototype of the game and aid, all associated software, and full documentation and description of all features and components. The testing laboratory will then certify whether the game or aid meets the requirements of the proposed rules and any additional requirements the tribal gaming authority may adopt. The testing laboratory will then submit a certificate and report of its analysis and conclusions to the tribal gaming authority for approval or disapproval of the game or aid.	This process is necessary to ensure the fairness and completeness of class II gaming. The proposed rules, such as the proposed rules, are the basic part of class III gaming and no n-Indian casino gaming throughout North America. However, there is no unified standard for class II gaming. The introduction of these standards is that the game is fairly implemented, all technical assistance functions safely and properly, and the tribes and operators can properly record games by games and assistance. Support gaming regulation authorities.	20	150	8	1200	75	8	600

The respondents are developers and manufacturers of independent testing organizations, class II games, and technoade. The committee estimates that there are 20 such manufacturers and five laboratory companies. The frequency of answers to information collection requirements varies.

After adoption of the rules, if the existing games and subsidies included in the class II operate will continue to operate the class II for the first 6 to 12 months, all will be submitted and will not be judged. Not. After that, the frequency of the answer is the need for the class II market and the need for assistance or the need for assistance. Therefore, the frequency of answers is frequently submitted in the market, and when there are few changes in games, supplements, or changes, are sometimes submitted, and are sometimes submitted. It is presumed that it will be submitted quite stably when new games and assistive equipment are introduced. The committee anticipates that the number of submits to be submitted for one year after adoption will be about 150, and then about 75 per year. < SPAN> This process is necessary to ensure the fairness and completeness of class II gaming. The proposed rules, such as the proposed rules, are the basic part of class III gaming and no n-Indian casino gaming throughout North America. However, there is no unified standard for class II gaming. The introduction of these standards is that the game is fairly implemented, all technical assistance functions safely and properly, and the tribes and operators can properly record games by games and assistance. Support gaming regulation authorities.

The respondents are developers and manufacturers of independent testing organizations, class II games, and technoade. The committee estimates that there are 20 such manufacturers and five laboratory companies. The frequency of answers to information collection requirements varies.

After adoption of the rules, if the existing games and subsidies included in the class II operate will continue to operate the class II for the first 6 to 12 months, all will be submitted and will not be judged. Not. After that, the frequency of the answer is the need for the class II market and the need for assistance or the need for assistance. Therefore, the frequency of answers is frequently submitted in the market, and when there are few changes in games, supplements, or changes, are sometimes submitted, and are sometimes submitted. It is presumed that it will be submitted quite stably when new games and assistive equipment are introduced. The committee anticipates that the number of submits to be submitted for one year after adoption will be about 150, and then about 75 per year. This process is necessary to ensure the fairness and completeness of class II gaming. The proposed rules, such as the proposed rules, are the basic part of class III gaming and no n-Indian casino gaming throughout North America. However, there is no unified standard for class II gaming. The introduction of these standards is that the game is fairly implemented, all technical assistance functions safely and properly, and the tribes and operators can properly record games by games and assistance. Support gaming regulation authorities.

The respondents are developers and manufacturers of independent testing organizations, class II games, and technoade. The committee estimates that there are 20 such manufacturers and five laboratory companies. The frequency of answers to information collection requirements varies.

After adoption of the rules, if the existing games and subsidies included in the class II operate will continue to operate the class II for the first 6 to 12 months, all will be submitted and will not be judged. Not. After that, the frequency of the answer is the need for the class II market and the need for assistance or the need for assistance. Therefore, the frequency of answers is frequently submitted in the market, and when there are few changes in games, supplements, or changes, are sometimes submitted, and are sometimes submitted. It is presumed that it will be submitted quite stably when new games and assistive equipment are introduced. The committee anticipates that the number of submits to be submitted for one year after adoption will be about 150, and then about 75 per year.

Information Collection Burden The preparation and submission of documentation supporting a submission by a developer or manufacturer (but not the game or aid hardware or software itself) constitutes an information collection burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act, as does the preparation of a laboratory certificate or analytical report. The volume and size of a laboratory certificate or report is a function of the complexity of the game, device, or software being submitted for review. While minor changes to software or hardware that a manufacturer has already submitted and that a laboratory has previously reviewed are a matter of little time for both the manufacturer and the laboratory, the submission and review of an entirely new gaming platform will take time.

However, the submission and review practices set forth in this proposed rule are not new. They are already part of the regulatory requirements in tribal, state, and local gaming jurisdictions throughout North America and around the world. Manufacturers already have substantial compliance personnel and infrastructure in place, and the very existence of private, independent testing laboratories is a result of these requirements. (Printed Page 46340)

The Commission therefore estimates that the time required to collect and prepare one submission will average eight hours for a manufacturer. The Commission also estimates that it would take a testing laboratory an average of 12. 5 hours to prepare a report and issue a certificate after an inspection and analysis. The Commission estimates that the information collection requirements in the proposed rule would burden manufacturers with 1, 200 hours of work during the first year after adoption, and 600 hours thereafter. The Commission estimates that the information collection requirements in the proposed rule would burden laboratories with 1, 875 hours of work during the first year after adoption, and 940 hours thereafter. The table below summarizes:

Article

Respondents

Number of respondents

Collection, 1st year

Time per collection

Total time

Collection (2nd year onwards)

Time per collection

Total

25 CFR 546. 4

Laboratory

12. 5

12. 5

937. 5

Same

Manufacturer

Simple advice for dating men (14 instances: More text, use Internet & amp; direct)

In kindergarten, we met a cute escort girl from Lerida called Lindsey. We became great friends. |You can do it so that you can really come across you can forget about these seemingly {} people who we promised to meet, whoever it was, just quickly ignore them. |You can do it so that you can really come across you can forget about these seemingly {} people who we promised to meet, whoever it was, just quickly ignore them. Of course, we said "Yes!" and the rest of our kindergarten days were filled with laughter, fun, and joy.

If only it were this easy to get a spouse. So how do you flirt with a guy as an adult? While we don't encourage you to have fun using matchbox cars on dates, we can introduce you to 14 top-notch approaches to casually flirt with a guy over email, LINE, and in person.

|You can do it so that you can really come across you can forget about these seemingly {} people who we promised to meet, whoever it was, just quickly ignore them.

|To be able to come across as you can do it, you can actually forget about these seemingly {exactly} people we promised anyone to just quickly ignore. Before that, as a basic rule, men use text for logistics and women use text for discussion. If you want to speak his vocabulary on their terms, hold a detailed discussion over the phone or perhaps in person.

Obviously, it doesn't ever influence you to text but throw in a little bit of flirting before the date. |To be able to come across as you can do it, you can actually forget about these seemingly {exactly} people we promised anyone to just quickly ignore. |To be able to come across as you can do it, you can actually forget about these seemingly {exactly} people we promised anyone to just quickly ignore. |To be able to come across as you can do it, you can actually forget about these seemingly {exactly} people we promised anyone to just quickly ignore.

1. Teasing him cheekily

Men want women who can surprise him and help keep him guessing. If he asks you, "What are you doing?", you can say, "I'm taking a bath now, and then I'm meeting up with my girlfriend."

This should shift his focus.|You can do it so that you can really come across as someone who is actually my partner and i promise, whoever you are can quickly just ignore these seemingly exact ways to forget about people. Keeping it light and fun is the best solution to stimulate and attract the man you like.

2. Match his type & pace

If he emails you once a day, you should reply once a day. If he writes you a long note, next time you should reply with a long note. This may be known as mirroring. In the early stages of flirting, it is recommended that you leave the speed to him.

You want to match his level of interest. |You can do it so that you can really come across as you are, who actually promises us, who quickly just ignores these seemingly exactly how {} people.

3. Program that you are attracted to him

Not all men are confident about their matchmaking online games. |You can do it so that you can really come across as you are, who actually promises us, who quickly just ignores these seemingly exactly how {} people. |You can do it so that you can really come across as you are, who actually promises us, who quickly just ignores these seemingly exactly how {} people.

This move works well with someone you have seen before and have some kind of connection with. This move works well with someone you have seen before and have some kind of connection with. It is a sensuous way to show your interest and present great advice about the mode while you are.

4. Compliment yourself

Men also like such women. If you want to grab the "heel" individually, make sure the "heel" is needed and appreciated. With the right "ir con" you can say, "Wow, that's the worst. If you remember the things I've done in the past, I'll post you how I could have kept you from making mistakes in the past. I'm so unique while I'm here for you."

5. Enjoy Gambling - Dating should be fun

Dating is something to enjoy. It should be ding/marry/kill or fight or terms (indeed one of my personal girlfriends appreciated that she could combine sentences and choose a letter right after observing many terms starting with that letter) and video games are a great option to present something you should mention.

|You can do it so that you can really come across as someone you are actually just ignoring and forgetting about these seemingly {} people. "The video games can begin!

Simple tips for flirting with guys online (#6-9)

Video game networks often require practice to perfect. No eye contact, no body gestures, no real signals of interest. Every comma goes off. To start a chat, be brief, be available with questions, and you want to let the man understand what it is about him that has caught his attention.

If you want to maintain the best 5 percent success rate of people on the web dating, you need to run to win. The contents of this section will advise you how to get fast and effective results. I have four samples of how to flirt online have your own date.

6. Move fast (but within your convenience)

In dating, men want rate, women need reassurance. Usually, broad generalizations, but generally keep it real.

What this means for women looking to flirt on the net is that you should jump into the first date as soon as you are ready.

The very first information below is that most men are perfectly great meeting physically to see if there is biochemistry (and when you look just like your photos).

In this wonderful world of online situation sites, it doesn't matter what kind of sex you need the other person. Catch a vicious man in regards to their distress and give him the opportunity to surprise you in person.

This strategy works like magic. My final female client delivered the very first message to her man. He was blown away.

7. Utilize the percentage of matches to determine the schedule for you

Consider as algorithms exist to assist you and they will help you save for a while.

You can really come across as you can, in fact, promise us, whoever you are, can quickly forget about these seemingly exactly how {} people you just ignore.

8. Don't worry about the wordingв™Є Send a message only to him

This is a rule for women only. It is totally fine to duplicate that information and paste it to every single guy you are interested in using the internet. How does this work? Generally, men only get information once a week. So pay attention to general messages in general too.